29 November 2006

Local Govt Pension Scheme - what's happened and what's next?

As reported in our previous posting, Local Government Minister Phil Woolas has spiked the negotiations over our pension scheme. Minutes before the LGA and the Local Government Employers were due to consider fresh proposals from the trade unions, he made a Statement in Parliament, announcing the core aspects of the new pension scheme for England and Wales from 1 April 2008. Neither the employers or the unions had been warned that the statement would be made.

At a meeting on 14 October, he had urged the LGA and LGE to negotiate with the unions, in line with the April Joint Statement. He said that he would prefer us to reach a negotiated agreement, which could then be translated in draft Regulations for consultation.

The employers and the unions had written to him, explaining that significant progress had been made in the talks and earlier this week, Keith Sonnet, Deputy General Secretary, had asked him not to make a statement until the talks had been concluded next week. No reply was received.

The proposals, which will appear as draft Regulations around 30 November, appeared less than an hour before a planned meeting with the LGE and the LGA at which the progress we had made in recent discussions was to be reported by LGA and LGE officials to the Minister.



THE KEY PROPOSALS


The Minister’s statement and the DCLG letter containing the proposals are attached. Although the Statement contains some positive proposals, including retention of a final salary scheme based on a 1/60 accrual rate and some benefit improvements, they are unacceptable overall.

Contribution rates

DCLG are proposing an unacceptable tiered contribution structure in which LGPS members pay 5.5% on the first £12,000 of pensionable pay rising to a top rate of 7.5%. They claim that this produces an average employee contribution rate of 6.3%. The rates proposed reduce the employer contribution by 0.3% and increase the average employee rate by the same amount!

The proposed rates would mean a reduction in contribution for those earning under £12,000 from £720 to £660 a year. Those earning £16,000 would pay the same rate as now – 6%, with those earning between £12,000 and £16,000 paying less than now. Those earning £20,000 will be paying 6.3%. This increases to 6.7% for those earning £30,000 and 6.9% for those earning £40,000. Manual members currently paying 5% “protected” contributions will have to pay at least 5.5%.

According to 2005 Local Government Employers’ paybill and workforce figures, this means that approximately 70% of full-time council workers will have to pay more than at present. The majority of part-time workers would pay the same or less. However, it is recognised by Government that only about 55% of part-time workers in local government are LGPS members. Equivalent figures for other sectors in the LGPS will be examined.

Protection

No additional protection is proposed from the 2016 tapered to 2020 already in the last set of Regulations. Scotland has agreed to 2020 and Northern Ireland may have even further protection. We have argued for full protection, in line with every other public sector scheme

Existing scheme members

Although this conflicts with the Minister’s statement and the accompanying DCLG letter, civil servants have also made it known that they do not intend to allow existing, protected members to transfer to the new scheme in 2008. They will continue with the 1/80 accumulation rate and 3/80 lump sum. The Trade Union Side want existing scheme members to benefit from any improvements to the new scheme, not a “two-tier” pension.

Accumulation rate

The accumulation rate for new members from 2008 will be 1/60, with the ability to commute up to 25% of pension to a lump sum on a £1 lump sum for every £12 of pension. The improved accumulation rate is one of the few improvements in the proposals.

Ill health retirement

There will be new, three-tiered ill health provisions, with a top tier for total incapacity, with total incapacity benefits favouring younger people least likely to need them! UNISON does not support these and they run counter to the LGA response to the consultation document, which stated their opposition to tiered benefits

Early release of pension

This will be 55 by 2010 for existing members and new joiners from 1 April 2008, except on the grounds of ill health.

Calculation period

The best three consecutive years salary within the last ten years will be used to calculate the pension. The Trade Union Side was seeking this improvement.

Partners’ pensions and children’s benefits

Partners’ pensions for spouses, civil partners and nominated dependent partners at a 1/160 accrual rate. This accrual rate would also apply to children’s benefits. The letter is silent on backdating. UNISON wants backdating to at least 1988.

Death in service benefits

This would be increased from twice salary to three times under the proposals.

Post retirement lump sum

There will be ‘scope’ for a lump sum death benefit up to 10 years.

Phased retirement

Some members, ‘under specified circumstances’, could take some of their pension while continuing to work.

Additional pension

There will be a facility for members to buy up to a maximum of £5000 additional pension and to buy AVC’s through external providers.


WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?


General Secretary Dave Prentis is calling on the Minister to allow the talks to continue to allow us to try to reach an agreement, despite the Statement to Parliament. The Service Group Liaison Committee will meet on 1 December, followed by meetings of the Service Groups on 4 December. Unless the discussions are allowed to continue, an industrial action ballot looks inevitable.

Each of the Service Groups covered by the LGPS has been given the go ahead by the Service Group Liaison Committee to hold a Special Conference subject to NEC approval on 6 December. The Local Government SGE had already requested one and will ask the Local Government Standing Orders Committee to make appropriate arrangements. The Police and Higher Education SGE’s have voted not to hold a Special Conference.



THE STATEMENT
DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PENSION SCHEME


The Minister for Local Government (Mr Phil Woolas): The Government’s objective for Local Government Pension Scheme in England and Wales is to ensure it is viable, affordable to both Scheme members and employers, and fair to the taxpayers who ultimately provide its security.

The local government workforce, and the other employees who are eligible for Scheme membership, need access to a good quality pension scheme to provide for their retirement. All stakeholders believe the Scheme is an essential component of the reward strategies for local government’s and certain associated employers’ workforces. The Scheme, therefore, should be as flexible and accessible as possible, for both employees and employers, and provide a modern, equality-proofed range of defined benefits both now and in the future. It must meet the challenge of being attractive to existing and future employees, and to their employers, in and around local government. However, in meeting these objectives, an equitable and proportionate balance must be struck between the level of pension benefits provided by the Scheme, and the actual cost of providing those benefits.

Principles and propositions for the long term reform of the Scheme were first circulated to all Scheme stakeholders in October 2004. Subsequent regulatory amendments were made to the Scheme to reflect changes in taxation legislation, to improve its governance and deficit management, to achieve cost- stability linked to the outcome of the 2004 actuarial valuation exercise and to further the Government’s objective of ending employment discrimination on grounds of age. A number of lawful and affordable protections for existing Scheme members were also introduced, linked to the final removal of an age discriminatory provision, the rule of 85, with effect from 1 October 2006.

To begin the final stages towards introducing, from 1 April 2008, a new-look Local Government Pension Scheme, a national consultation exercise, Where Next? – Options for a new-look Local Government Pension Scheme in England and Wales, took place between 30 June and 29 September this year. It invited stakeholders’ views on four costed options - an updated current scheme with benefit improvements; a new final salary scheme with an improved accrual rate; a new career average scheme; and a new hybrid scheme combining a career average core with a final salary top-up option. A range of benefit structure changes was proposed, along with several propositions to address future Scheme costs, levels of contributions by both members and employers, greater benefit flexibility, new early retirement provisions and targeted ill health benefits.

Careful consideration has now been given to the outcome of that consultation exercise; the responses received have been helpful and informative. Some Scheme administering authorities, in particular, conducted helpful, detailed costing assessments of their position in relation to the range of options put forward. An analysis of the responses received to the consultation exercise has now been completed and is available at http://www.communities.gov.uklgps/

Against that background, I am announcing that the Government’s regulatory intentions for the future structure of the Local Government Pension Scheme’s benefit package will be shortly circulated to interested parties for detailed analysis and comment. The consultation package will propose that the Scheme remains as a final salary pension arrangement and be based on an accrual of 1/60th of salary for each year of membership. It will continue to have a normal pension age of 65, and will move towards providing, by 2010, for pensions to be paid no earlier than age 55, rather than the current minimum age of 50, except on grounds of ill-health. A revised and better targeted ill-health retirement package is to be proposed, and survivor benefits, which are available for spouses, civil partners, and children, will be extended to include other co-habiting partners. In order to help equality-proof the Scheme, tiered employee contribution rates, linked to salary, will be introduced, as well as more flexible retirement provisions. Arrangements will be included which protect the accrued rights of all existing Scheme members up to 31 March 2008. All present and future members of the Scheme will build up rights in the new-look Scheme from 1 April 2008. In addition, the protections already provided in the current Scheme for eligible members, at no cost to taxpayers, following the final removal of the rule of 85 from the Scheme, from 1 October 2006, will be retained.

The Government is mindful of the need to maintain stability of costs in the new-look Scheme and a fair and equitable balance in its long-term resourcing between members, employers and taxpayers. The Government’s intention throughout this reform process has been to ensure that no additional costs are imposed on taxpayers. It is intended, therefore, to establish an appropriate mechanism for sharing future cost pressures and to have the arrangements in place by March 2009. These will both inform and take account of the 2010 actuarial valuation of the Scheme. The new arrangements can be taken into account when individual fund actuaries set new employer contribution rates in the valuations which will take effect from 1 April 2011. This important timetable will be reflected in the new Scheme regulatory framework programmed to take effect from 1 April 2008.

The package, as a whole, is both workable and affordable. Overall, it meets the balance of responses received to the recent consultation exercise and complies with the Government’s central policy objectives for the Scheme’s reform, particularly in terms of its viability, affordability and fairness to members and taxpayers.

To assist in the on-going monitoring of the Scheme’s regulatory and policy development, Communities and Local Government will establish a policy review group of key interested parties. The group will focus on strategic issues, establish common ground between stakeholders and to monitor demographic experience in the Scheme as a basis for co-operative decision-making on Scheme developments, regulatory changes and Scheme cost-sharing. The work of the group will be reported regularly to Ministers and will complement the usual statutory and non-statutory consultation arrangements which already exist within the current regulatory framework of the Scheme.

For the new-look Scheme to be fully available and operational for all categories of members and prospective members, from 1 April 2008, the Government’s timetable and programme of reform requires regulations to be in place for 1 April 2007. Accordingly, draft regulations which set out in detail the proposed benefit package for the new Scheme will be circulated next month to interested parties in England and Wales to reflect the terms of this statement, as well as setting out the actual regulatory framework necessary to give full effect to the new Scheme. This will allow the terms of the new arrangements to be taken into account as part of the 2007 actuarial valuation exercise. As a first step in the consultation process, further details of the proposed new-look Scheme regulatory framework and this statement are being circulated to interested parties in England and Wales today as part of the required statutory consultation process.

In addition, these regulations will be followed shortly by associated draft regulatory changes in a separate draft statutory instrument, dealing with the administration aspects of the new Scheme and to a similar implementation timetable.

27 November 2006

MINISTER SPIKES PENSION NEGOTIATIONS

Local Government Minister Phil Woolas yesterday made a hostile intervention which spiked talks between the unions and the employers, in which real progress was being made over proposals for the ‘new look’ LGPS.

Minutes before the employers were due to consider fresh proposals from the trade unions, Minister Phil Woolas made a Statement in Parliament, announcing a new pension scheme for England and Wales. Neither the employers or the unions had been warned that the statement would be made.

At a meeting on 14 October, Phil Woolas had urged the LGA and LGE to negotiate with the unions, in line with the April Joint Statement. He said that he would prefer us to reach a negotiated agreement, which could then be translated in draft Regulations for consultation.

The employers and the unions had written to Phil Woolas, explaining that significant progress had been made in the talks and earlier this week, Keith Sonnet, Deputy General Secretary, had asked him not to make a statement until the talks had been concluded next week. No reply was received.

The proposals, which will appear as draft Regulations around 30 November, appeared less than an hour before a planned meeting with the LGE and the LGA at which the progress we had made in recent discussions was to be reported by LGA and LGE officials to the Minister.

The Minster’s statement and the DCLG letter containing the proposals can be downloaded from DCLG website www.communities.gov.uk/lgps. Although the Statement contains some positive proposals, including retention of a final salary scheme based on a 1/60 accrual rate and some benefit improvements, they are unacceptable overall for the following reasons:

• The employee contribution rate is increased for the majority of scheme members from 6% to 7.5%

• The employer contribution rate is substantially reduced and effectively subsidised by the increased employee contribution rate

• The is no additional protection for existing scheme members to compensate for the loss of the 85 Rule, despite far better arrangements being agreed in Scotland

• There would be substantially reduced benefits for those forced to retire early on grounds of ill health

What happens next?

General Secretary Dave Prentis is calling on the Minister to allow the talks to continue to allow us to try to reach an agreement, despite the Statement to Parliament. The Service Group Liaison Committee will meet next week, followed by meetings of the Service Groups on 4 December. Unless the discussions are allowed to continue, an industrial action ballot looks inevitable.

17 November 2006

FAREPAK FIASCO

Hundreds if not thousands of UNISON members are likely to have been affected by the Christmas hamper and voucher company going bust. Overall 100,00 people mostly on low incomes have lost £40m with typical customers losing £500

This is especially lamentable as Farepak's customers have taken the responsible route and saved throughout the year for Christmas instead of accumulating debt.

HBOS who acted as bankers to the company have as yet not accepted any financial or moral obligation.

UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis has written to the Chairperson of HBOS urging the bank to take the initiative and play a proactive role by agreeing to fully fund the losses incurred by Farepak's customers.

Altough a special charitable fund has been set up by DTI minister Ian McCartney to help those affected there is no guarantee that they will be fully reimbursed. Unison is working with Labour MP's to highlight the issue and get justice for Farepak customers.

Customers who used Visa cards may be able to get their money back but there is no telling how long they may have to wait.

More information is available at www.farepak.co.uk and www.farepakresponsefund.org.uk

UNISON welfare may be able to help mambers experiencing hardship so please contact the Branch if you are in this position or are a steward who knows of someone in this position.

Jo Myers
Branch Welfare Officer

13 November 2006

HR integration comments and questions

UNISON raised the following on behalf of our members following the second round of briefings/workshops on 30th Oct and 3rd Nov:

The lack of supporting information presented at the meeting makes it difficult to make informed comments. Would need to see old and new structures together.

If the authority has a priority to reduce sickness levels how does it propose to do this with reduced resources?

Has the income generated from Education (schools) been taken into account in this process?

Where is the re-deployment team?

Have options to generate income been considered and if so what were they?

How many vacant posts are there currently and at what levels?

Links with other authorities need to be established when looking for redeployment opportunities.

The SLA for schools has to be complete for December, has this been taken into account in this process?

How will the teaching unions be consulted with?

Admin posts across the board need to be identified.

Drawing up structures before you know what service you are going to provide could lead to yet more changes, how will change of service be communicated to managers?

Unrealistic timescales for formal consultation given the level of proposed changes.
Structures appear to be top heavy Service Head roles look isolated from Departments.

Where is the rationale document?

Concerns that specialist knowledge will be lost.

There has been no discussion regarding best practice across the authority how will you be able to ensure that this is not lost?

Who will Section 188 notice include?




Claire Gollin, HR Service Head, responded on behalf of management as follows:

Further to your email to Jack Markiewicz dated 6th November providing comments and raising a number of questions following the 2 consultation events with HR staff last week. You will be aware that Jack is currently undertaking Jury Service and he has therefore asked me to respond to you direct in his absence. I can assure you that all comments provided by staff either at these and previous events, through separate correspondence direct with Jack and/or through their trade unions will be taken into consideration by HRLG in its ongoing work on the new structure which we aim to publish on 1st December (with other new structures in line with corporate requirements). In relation to questions raised in your email, on our proposals:

Income generated from sold services to schools has been factored into the budget available for the new structure.

A redeployment service for the whole authority is located in the Attendance Management specialist team through the equivalent time of 2 of the Sc 5/6 FTE posts in that structure to undertake work on vacancy identification, liaison with managers and skill audits. This may be a shared role with AMO's within the overall team resource. Formal casework around redeployment situations, whether it stems from the sickness absence policy, other policies or from organisational change programmes will be undertaken by the operational/strategic teams working closely with the Attendance team.

Reducing sickness absence is a key priority for the County Council. Health, Safety and Welfare services are an essential proactive and responsive resource to enable us to do this and the Health Safety and OH team structure is resourced to ensure we can provide this capacity.The cross cutting Attendance Management team providing AMO support for managers across departments is also responsive to this.

All opportunities to generate income within the capacity available will be given proper consideration.

Currently we have a number of HR posts not filled on a permanent basis across the HR community, these are: 0.5 SO2 temporary vacancy in old environment team whilst postholder is on maternity leave, 1 FTE vacancy against a SC2/5 Personnel Assistant post in Environment, 2 Band C Principal Personnel Officers in Environment, currently being acted up , 1 FTE Personnel Officer (sc 3/6 Business support) in Education (may be filled on temp basis only), 1 FTE Team Leader SO1 (Business Support) currently filled on temp basis to 31.3.07, 2 FTE Clerical Assts Education Sc2 currently filled by temps, 1 FTE Sc1-4 Personnel Asst Education currently filled by a temp. This equates to 0.5 temp vacancy and 7 actual vacancies , 6 of which are filled by temp staff. These should also help us to reduce the impact of restructuring by deploying any displaced staff into these posts.

Although we hope to be able to achieve reductions by voluntary means, we will ask our neighbouring local authorities to give regard to any displaced HR staff(and staff from other functions) for any suitable vacancies they may have as part of our commitment to mitigate the impact of reduced capacity as far as possible. This has to rest on goodwill and we cannot regulate their responsiveness to such a request.
The HRLG sub team working on the SLA are aware of the interface with the "Management Choices" process for schools. Managers will be involved in and informed about the scope of services covered by the HR SLA when further work has been undertaken and of course good communication is key to this as it is to all other aspects.

Where we have members of staff in HR or elsewhere who are members of a teaching union we will make arrangements to consult with them, this could be through the CYP department JCNP.

As stated at the consultation events, HRLG are giving further consideration to admin resources including the disaggregation of existing admin support which is not directly part of the HR establishment.

The HR Service Head establishment has already been agreed and appointed to. The new Service Heads will have both strategic and operational responsibility and will, especially initially, spend a significant proportion of their time with their HR teams and with management teams in departments.

Part of the principle behind integration is consistency and standardisation with resultant efficiencies and quality control, HRLG have already considered practice across departments and will continue to do so when working on the detail of the HR structure, including job descriptions.

Rationale documents for the next stage below Service Head appointments in the integrated Resources department and other service departments are currently being produced by the Designing The Future Project team and will cross reference budgetary and business drivers for the change agenda which have already been communicated to staff and highlighted in consultation events to date.

We are aiming to issue a Section 188 notice covering those staff in the integrated Resources department (who have not already been subject to a 188 notice), on or before 1st December, I mentioned this at the last ICJF. We will also be going out to these staff for expressions of interest in VR at about same time. I am the contact point for this if you need to discuss further.

In conclusion Jack has stated that he will make time to personally talk to HR teams at their request when he is back from his Jury Service and we will continue to communicate and consult with our staff in as many ways as possible throughout the ongoing consultation period.