22 February 2007

HR consultation deadline extended

Following the meeting of members of HR on 15th Feb. UNISON wrote to Jack Markiewicz raising several concerns. He has responded following a meeting of HRMT on 20th Feb and the correspondence is set out below for members:




15/02/2007 16:04
To: Jack Markiewiczcc
Subject: HR job description consultation deadline

Jack,

Following this morning's meeting, members have asked for an extra week to consider job descriptions on the grounds that H&S posts were only made available on 14th Feb and that next week is half term week with many people taking leave.

There is also a problem with the structure as presented this morning not being finalised (3 posts missing, who is to carry out the absence management work, lack of clarity about admin posts etc) and the effect this has on deciding whether the job descriptions accurately reflect the roles staff will be expected to carry out.

These two factors mean an extra week is needed for full and meaningful consultation, and this is based on the presumption that the issue about the missing posts etc are addressed this week before people break up for half term.

Members also wanted to know when they will know the indicative grades for the posts. You have explained in the briefings that the structure has been drawn up according to the budget available. Given that the budget includes staffing costs based on assumed grades for posts, please state when the indicative grades will be made available.

They also wanted to know when person specs would be made available. Whilst it is recognised that they are not needed for selecting who goes where in the enabling process, they are a significant factor in staff expressing preferences in the implementation stage of that process.

Comments on individual job descriptions will follow in due course.

Bob Watt
UNISON




From: Jack Markiewicz
Date: 22/02/2007 12:24

Bob,

I promised to respond to you when I had discussed these matters with colleagues at HRMT.

I have now had the discussion and I should like to respond to your points as follows.

1) HR Pay assistant posts being advertised on a permanent basis

As I described to you and colleagues at the event on the 15th Feb, the decision to fill the posts permanently was made following a case being made by Nigel Dowey connected with the need to engage motivated and high quality candidates, as we cannot afford to get payroll wrong. We were and still are not clear as to how many, if any, HR employees will be displaced at this level and, therefore, cannot predict how many posts will be needed.However, I have listened to the comments made by you and HR colleagues and I am mindful that the 188 process is about trying to mitigate the impact of any potential redundancies. Furthermore I recognise that these posts could be used as redeployment posts, and therefore, I have changed the decision to appoint permanently, but to only recruit on a temporary basis.I am also advising that we shall do this for the permanent HR team leader posts too, when they are advertised.

2) Consultation on job descriptions

I have agreed to extend this period from the 23rd to the 28th February. You will know that we have enabling meetings booked for the 5th, 6th and 7th March, which will need the job descriptions to be finalised before then.

3) three posts left in the structure - to be allocated

It was helpful to get the views of colleagues at the event on the 15th Feb and it is the intention of HRMT to allocate the resource to departmental HR teams so that they can deal with sickness absence casework. The revised structure charts will show this change.

4) Indicative grades

You will see from the project plan that we anticipate to have the indicative grades for posts by mid March. We are conscious that we need to put together some HAY statements that will take some time and the work will begin a soon as possible.

5) Person Specs

As you have correctly pointed out, it is not necessary to have person specs for the enabling process but we are currently working on these and they will be available when the outcomes of the enabling process are published.

I hope that this is helpful and please let me know if you would want to discuss further.

Jack Markiewicz
Service Director (HR)
Nottinghamshire County Council




The trade unions are meeting in the morning on 27th Feb as part of their preparation for the departmental JCNP, and UNISON & GMB are meeting with Jack in the afternoon to discuss the HR part of the restructuring. Any comments can be sent to me via the NCC e-mail system.

If you are not a member of UNISON, now is the time to join. You can download an application form from the Branch Website by clicking here

No comments: